Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 14 Download : 16

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: 


This study examines the crucial significance of digital payments in the business environment of Kuta, a prominent tourist destination undergoing worldwide digital change.


Methodology:


By utilizing purposive sampling, a total of 100 respondents were specifically selected to guarantee a minimum sample size of 82 respondents for a thorough and reliable study. The research attempts to gain a full understanding of how local business actors in Kuta view and implement digital payment options using offline questionnaires. The Smart PLS SEM approach will be used to carefully analyze the obtained data to reveal insights into the perceptions and behavioral intentions associated with digital payments in these contents.


Findings:


The statistical significance of observed effects is assessed using p-values, which indicate the only factors that significantly and favourably influence behavioural intention (BI) to adopt digital payment systems are effort expectation (EE) and facilitating condition (FC) (p < 0.05)., the impacts of Performance Expectancy (PE) and Social Influence (SI) lack statistical significance, indicating the possibility of random outcomes.


Conclusion:


To summarize, the study highlights that out of the four independent variables, only Effort Expectancy and Facilitating Condition had a significant influence on behavioral intention to implement digital payment systems in Kuta.


Keywords: Digital Payment, Behavioural Intention, Expectancy

Keywords

Digital Payment Behavioral Intention Expectancy

Article Details

References

  1. Al-Okaily, M., Lutfi, A., Alsaad, A., Taamneh, A., & Alsyouf, A. (2020). The Determinants of Digital Payment Systems’ Acceptance under Cultural Orientation Differences: The Case of Uncertainty Avoidance. Technology in Society, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101367
  2. Baabdullah, A. M. ;, Baabdullah, A. M., Alalwan, A. A., Rana, N. P., Kizgin, H., & Patil, P. (2018). Consumer use of mobile banking (M-Banking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an integrated model Item Type Article Consumer Use of Mobile Banking (M-Banking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an Integrated Model Consumer Use of Mobile Banking (M-Banking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an Integrated Model. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/17210
  3. Chaveesuk, S., Khalid, B., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2022). Continuance intention to use digital payments in mitigating the spread of COVID-19 virus. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(2), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.12.001
  4. Deva Ferdana, A., Ajib Ridlwan, A., Canggih, C., & Fikriyah, K. (n.d.). ZISWAF: Jurnal Zakat dan Wakaf Z Generation’s Intention to Use Zakat Digital Payment: The Mediating Effect of Trust.
  5. Erjavec, J., & Manfreda, A. (2022). Online shopping adoption during COVID-19 and social isolation: Extending the UTAUT model with herd behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102867
  6. Fabris, N. (2019). Cashless society–the future of money or a utopia? Journal of Central
  7. BankingTheory and Practice, 8(1), 53–66.
  8. Grant, R., & Danziger, J. (n.d.). UC Irvine I.T. in Business Title Exploring the Corporate Benefits and Employee Adoption of Corporate E-learning Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/34q832jt Publication Date. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/34q832jt
  9. Kantika, K., Kurniasari, F., & Mulyono, M. (2022). The Factors Affecting Digital Bank Services Adoption Using Trust as Mediating Variable. Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(10), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.47153/jbmr310.4882022
  10. Kwabena, G.-Y., Qiang, M., Wenyuan, L., Qalati, S. A., & Erusalkina, D. (2019). EFFECTS OF THE DIGITAL PAYMENT SYSTEM ON SMES PERFORMANCE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; A CASE OF GHANA. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2997
  11. Ma, C., Jin, Z., Mei, Z., Zhou, F., She, X., Huang, J., & Liu, D. (2022). Internet of Things Background: An Empirical Study on the Payment Intention of Central Bank Digital Currency Design. Mobile Information Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4846372
  12. Nordhoff, S., Louw, T., Innamaa, S., Lehtonen, E., Beuster, A., Torrao, G., Bjorvatn, A., Kessel, T., Malin, F., Happee, R., & Merat, N. (2020). Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A representative questionnaire study among 8,044 car drivers from seven European countries. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/
  13. Prawira, K., Makmur, A., & Santoso, H. (2023). Enterprise architecture for payment system industry in industrial era 4.0. Sinkron, 8(1), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i1.11933
  14. Rasheed Gaber, H., & Elsamadicy, A. M. (2021). What drives customers to continue using ride-sharing apps during the COVID-19 pandemic? The case of Uber in Egypt. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1944009
  15. Sasongko, D., Yuliawati, M., Nurhidayah, R., Utomo, R. G., Setyawan, A., & Suciati, K. (2021). Pengembangan Pemasaran UMKM Asih Di Kabupaten Magelang Dengan Memanfaatkan Digital Marketing. In Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Ipteks (Vol. 7, Issue 1).
  16. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, S. L. (2013). Multicollinearity and singularity. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education Inc, 2(013), 88-91.
  17. Trinugroho, I., Pamungkas, P., Wiwoho, J., Damayanti, S., & Pramono, T. (2022). Adoption of digital technologies for micro and small business in indonesia. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102156
  18. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  19. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412